Yes, you are wrong as is anyone else making the claim the law targeted mothers first no matter what.
-
-
Replying to @parks_dept @csilverandgold and
And we're back at square one, not a single example of power being used against feminists.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
huh? Did you read any of those links? They're all sufficient to show that women are disproportionately held liable for others' crimes.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The law does not target them in any way, the application however leads to unequal results in a very small sample size.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @parks_dept @csilverandgold and
Also, not liable for others crimes, liable for not coming forward to stop abusive partner, itself a crime.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
So women, who have not committed violence, are disproportionately held responsible for those who have committed violence...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @parks_dept and
although in many cases, those women held responsible may have been victims of violence from the same party as well.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @parks_dept and
I just... can we be serious? Doesn't that seem like state bias against women? I'm not saying it's intentional, I'm saying it's systemic.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Did you read the links??? Women are not liable while their partner goes free. They are held liable when they don't report a crime
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes, and the argument goes that the expectation to report that crime should not result in criminal liability when your own life is in danger
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
and certainly I can't see why the mother's sentence would be LONGER than the actual abuser's, examples of which are provided in the links.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.