Agreed that 'identity left' often gets focused on obvious cultural things over less obvious structural legal factors.
-
-
Replying to @csilverandgold @charlescwcooke
I think this is often bc we have had more success gaining cultural power than political power (in part bc ID pol originated in academia...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @charlescwcooke
in part bc of how the Constitution distributes power geographically.) But nevertheless, it hurts our arguments when we seem more upset...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @charlescwcooke
over culture than over actual concrete unjust laws. That's a totally fair point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @charlescwcooke
I would say, though, that part of our core argument is that a) men's material interests make sexist ideas dangerously seductive...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @charlescwcooke
and so we fight extra hard against those ideas, which is where the accusations of thought policing come in, which I don't fully deny...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @charlescwcooke
and b) those ideas are also very dangerous to women, because in the social justice understanding, gender differences = due to acculturation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @charlescwcooke
so actually a key part of achieving gender parity in fields like engineering is fighting against arguments that root disparity in biology.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @charlescwcooke
And there's a bunch of other factors too but that's as tweet-friendly a way as I can phrase the feminist argument as I understand it...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
for why we're so heavy on the thought policing of ideas that root gender disparities in biology. (your turn!)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.