Shakespeare is all about the fiction of knowable interiorities (sometimes defending against their own knowable-ness c.f., Hamlet.)
-
But if those people are actual people, who experiences differ from ours... they are not transparent, they cannot be analyzed with our rubric
IDPOL insists that experience places a limit on the knowable-ness of other selves, and thus on the ability to legislate past experience.
-
-
Meanwhile, the Shakepeare-Freud genius of white/Western culture insists that other minds can be rendered transparent by language/analysis.
-
But how can you expect a-society-any-society to dis-concur with Shakespeare? All power is dangerous by definition, imaginative power too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.