that is, there should have been some EXTENSIVE outreach to Planned Parenthood and feminist orgs before they just rolled this out, imo.
-
-
Replying to @csilverandgold @sarahngu
You can't build a coalition by ignoring the people who have been there. Reach out, but talk to the folks who have been there first.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @sarahngu
but 2) the compromise I personally wish Dems would offer is "safe, legal, rare, and respected." Back to the safe, legal, and rare of Clinton
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @sarahngu
but with the additional idea of respecting women who do choose to have abortions, respecting women's bodily autonomy more broadly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @sarahngu
and 3) All that said, the national platform needn't = the beliefs of every single candidate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @sarahngu
And I do believe in the DCCC running candidates whose views align with 75+% of their constituents.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @csilverandgold @sarahngu
In some districts, that means running racists, sexists, pro-lifers, and other things that the national base doesn't love.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @sarahngu
I wouldn't have an attitude about a pro-life dem getting financial support personally. I'd have an attitude about them being in leadership.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @sarahngu
Which I say as a person who believes a culture of life, including discouraging abortion, particularly late-term, can be God-honoring.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @csilverandgold
Have you read My Life's Work?A moral argument for choice. It's by a Christian doctor and it was v good
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.