You honestly believe that racial characteristics are limited to skin color?
-
-
Replying to @KoenigJojo @CatoInstitute
nah, but for a twitter definition, skin color is close enough. That's certainly the primary historical determinant of "race"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @CatoInstitute
And that is why we are where we are. Human biodiversity is real. Races have inherent differences: time preference, IQ, violence, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KoenigJojo @CatoInstitute
The fact that you're defending scientific racism in 2017 is stunning. There is greater diversity within that between "races"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
*than
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
as such, race is an extremely foolish proxy to use for those other attributes you discussed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
also... come on man. That shit is disgusting. It's literal nazi philosophy. Can we not?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @CatoInstitute
Right. Inconvenient facts are not allowed to be discussed. Enjoy your dream world where you can't notice real biological differences.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KoenigJojo @CatoInstitute
well, yes, to be fair we do tend to suppress ideology that has a strong link to mass-murder of civilians, true.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
but you'll notice that I also made the primary scientific argument for the uselessness of race as a biological category.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
what's your response to that? We can also talk about the history of organized societies in Africa, or just look at our last two Presidents.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.