Except that it was the least racially/culturally biased meritocracy in US history. So empathy increased with exposure...
-
if we learned anything from 2016, it SHOULD have been that a narrative that invalidates experiences of ANY chunk of citizens
is a narrative that is very, very vulnerable to disruption and destruction. Why rely on the lazy argument?
-
-
where's the nuanced argument to say "front row has generally behaved less racist and less bigoted bc they actually know ppl"
-
"but just because front row was WAY right on one issue doesn't mean it can't be dangerously wrong on others." You need both.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.