Except that it was the least racially/culturally biased meritocracy in US history. So empathy increased with exposure...
but want to make a moral argument that the big bad front row shames and shuns the poor left behind back row.
-
-
if we learned anything from 2016, it SHOULD have been that a narrative that invalidates experiences of ANY chunk of citizens
-
is a narrative that is very, very vulnerable to disruption and destruction. Why rely on the lazy argument?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.