so why not open up the standards to see if your existing standards aren't missing people
-
-
from disadvantaged groups who might excel in the leadership roles they aren't currently on-track for.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
2) very very very very very often people who are behind, once they get into a training program...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
or once they get into a given role, are able to catch up. People are smart! Ambitious people who underperform
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
often end up outworking and outdoing those who are initially sailing through.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and 3) You can have training programs specifically aimed at getting more people from disadvantaged groups
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
ready for leadership. And you might say that's unfair to white people, but look at it this way...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
you say many of these black ppl are totally excelling and doing great, and yet not moving up the ranks...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
so people who are working really hard and doing really well are not getting the rewards that come with leadership
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I assume this includes more pay, certainly more influence and prestige.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
if someone who works just as hard doesn't get as far, doesn't that mean the system is rigged against that person?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.