If this is the strategy. This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. @SenateDems
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/30/politics/democrats-supreme-court-battle/index.html …
-
-
Replying to @csilverandgold @SenateDems
just cause you roll over for a radical today, doesn't mean you'll get a moderate when you fight tomorrow.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @SenateDems
Either Mitch is going to kill the filibuster or he won't. Whether he does it this time or next time (if there is a next time)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @SenateDems
makes 0 difference. So fight now and maybe you'll at least get 1 moderate, even if you end up with a radical for number 2.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @SenateDems
what you'll never get is for the R's to voluntarily propose 2 moderates. Maybe in the Bush days. Not now.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @SenateDems
And this time, you have at least some public opinion on your side bc of what they did to Merrick Garland.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @SenateDems
Strike while the iron is hot and everyone's pissed and everyone's behind you and the Trump team just overreached with the ban!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @SenateDems
don't wait for shit to cool down and then make a fuss over number 2 after you roll over for number 1.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @SenateDems
that's making you look weak AND hypocritical! If they offer you a moderate this time, take the deal. Sorry. They played you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
but no way in hell is anyone on their team smart enough for that shit. They're going to send a radical. Take it to the wall.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.