You mean when a candidate spends their time shitting on their primary opponent? So like... every candidate ever?
-
-
Replying to @csilverandgold
no, im referring to shitting on everyone. When you say PP is "part of the establishment" how can you be taken seriously?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darpa42
and before you say he voted for it, he's on record as voting for a bill he didn't like because of the violence against women act.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold
Hillary had 20 years to learn from saying superpredators. Bernie shat on PP less than a year ago.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darpa42 @csilverandgold
im pretty sure if it were public, I could find something you said 20 years ago to be upset about ;)
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darpa42
all politicians are messed up. Bernie connects in a way Hillary doesn't.. Sec. Clinton is likely to be a better executive.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold
the problem is that i find Bernie to be fascist in the same way Trump is. I guess i could take him seriously as a threat to
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darpa42
but even if they are both fascists, Trump is also a virulent racist. So you'll forgive me if I can't quite stomach the comparison.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold
of course trump is worse. His fanaticism is to terrible ends. But just b/c Bernie's ends are well intentioned doesn't mean
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darpa42 @csilverandgold
his methods and appeal aren't problematic
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I guess it comes down to if you believe that different groups have different interests based on how they make their money.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.