Authors of disputed “uncanny” 2019-nCoV preprint to voluntarily withdraw preprint: "It was not our intention to feed into the conspiracy theories...we appreciate the criticisms...and will get back with a revised version”https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1#comment-4779677688 …
-
-
The question we should ask is whether sunlight was a good bleach here (if it would have shown up somewhere anyway) or whether one should turn away preprints that are merely poor science not non-science (which begins to look like peer review). Opinions vary
-
If the answer to the latter question is yes then there are all sorts of implications for process, cost, accusations of subjectivity, etc. (Note that articles that might be a heath threat are already rejected but it would be hard to argue this was. In that category). All TBD
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.