It is worth pointing out that no editor worth their salt would ever permit such nonsense to go into public domain. It was not their intention to feed into conspiracy theories? Seriously?
-
-
-
That’s probably true. But in this era of predatory journals there are editors who would - see for example this ‘peer reviewed’ paper https://www.jpsr.pharmainfo.in/Documents/Volumes/vol10Issue11/jpsr10111820.pdf … so I suspect someone would have.
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This is good. Seems like a useful feature for bioRxiv to have a “retracted” banner. The way that there’s currently a banner for a revision.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Are you going to put a notice of withdrawal on the page?
-
it is in progress
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This is great. I did not know that one could withdraw a preprint. My ex-student published a work with imaginary friends (X-men characters). I requested that he immediately withdrew it but was told that one can only publish revised versions but not withdraw originals.
-
Can you tweet a link to the preprint? Sounds interesting ;-)
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Interesting comments below the post. Helpful for laypersons like mepic.twitter.com/SNsARwrNQj
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Wall clock on debunk with preprint... Days. That is an accelerated review system! Meanwhile ZeroHedge is deplatformed for linking to this only exacerbating the conspiracy via Streisand effect. Censorship doesn’t work.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.