It is worth pointing out that no editor worth their salt would ever permit such nonsense to go into public domain. It was not their intention to feed into conspiracy theories? Seriously?
-
-
-
That’s probably true. But in this era of predatory journals there are editors who would - see for example this ‘peer reviewed’ paper https://www.jpsr.pharmainfo.in/Documents/Volumes/vol10Issue11/jpsr10111820.pdf … so I suspect someone would have.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Are you going to put a notice of withdrawal on the page?
-
it is in progress
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wall clock on debunk with preprint... Days. That is an accelerated review system! Meanwhile ZeroHedge is deplatformed for linking to this only exacerbating the conspiracy via Streisand effect. Censorship doesn’t work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting comments below the post. Helpful for laypersons like mepic.twitter.com/SNsARwrNQj
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is good. Seems like a useful feature for bioRxiv to have a “retracted” banner. The way that there’s currently a banner for a revision.
-
There is (or will be in this case as it’s in progress)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
So, the open expert peer review actually worked in this case without the need for editors and the ‘secret privileged reviewers’!
-
Only because it's such a hot topic. I can't see a normal pre-print receiving this kind of attention.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.