Why do @sarahmei, after taking out Stallman, insist on dismantling the @fsf? What is her purpose here? What was her purpose when she posted this about GNU? Rebuilding a movement she was never part of? No. Eradicatingit? Maybe. https://twitter.com/sarahmei/status/817376351640399872 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @cryptomars @chochosmx and
Her actions cannot possibly be based on human rights or women's rights considerations because she is working for a company (
@salesforce) that is helping@CBP manage concentration camps.https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/aug/20/salesforce-us-customs-border-protection-contract-protests …1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @cryptomars @chochosmx and
Her $13 billion company is also involved in sex trafficking. We didn't see a tweet about this on her timeline in the last 6 months.https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/27/lawsuit-claims-salesforce-worked-with-sex-trafficking-site-backpage.html …
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cryptomars @chochosmx and
What kind of social justice warrior targets a $1 million NPO while turning a blind eye to a $13 billion criminal corporate behemoth that enables sex trafficking and concentration camps and pays her to keep quiet about it? What the hell is going on here?
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cryptomars @chochosmx and
So, your point is RMS' decades of mistreating women, and advocacy of pedophilia, is an acceptable price to pay for his decades of damaging Free Software?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CarlaSchroder @chochosmx and
"advocacy of pedophilia" Could you point me towards sources where Stallman advocates pedophilia?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cryptomars @CarlaSchroder and
When they say that, they mean the bit where he talks about consent being the big thing, and pedophilia and necrophilia are "okay if consensual." Which, in the modern world, is a pretty pro-pedophilia and pro-necrophilia stance.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @codefolio @CarlaSchroder and
He used the p word a few times in his "blog" (political notes). Using this word is really giving the stick to be beaten with. When he talks about "voluntary p..." I guess he just means "consensual sex between teenagers". I'm really not convinced he was doing the apology of crime.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cryptomars @CarlaSchroder and
He had a list of crimes there, not just the two I mention. And even in context, quotes like "for incest, contraception could be mandatory to avoid the risk of inbreeding" isn't (IMHO) particularly unclear. And that's only one of several posts by him.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @codefolio @CarlaSchroder and
You are really confused. The whole cancel crowd is clueless. You are equating "expressing ideas that disturb you" is not the same as "inciting to commit crime" which is not "committing crime". Can you fathom that expressing ideas or arguing is different from committing a crime?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
«Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.»
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.