Why do @sarahmei, after taking out Stallman, insist on dismantling the @fsf? What is her purpose here? What was her purpose when she posted this about GNU? Rebuilding a movement she was never part of? No. Eradicatingit? Maybe. https://twitter.com/sarahmei/status/817376351640399872 …
-
-
The initiator of the cancel campaign,
@sarahmei, is working for a company that is actually being prosecuted by 50 victims for sex trafficking. It's a shame that she decided to turn a blind eye to these actual horrendous crimes that happened right in front of her in her office. -
But I guess targetting your own $13 billion company (that made millions fom human trafficking thanks to Backpage), would require a higer degree of commitment to women's rights than attacking a tiny non profit and a guy who wrote offensive emails...https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2019/03/27/salesforce-sued-sex-trafficking/ …
-
Oh, he was offensive in person, too. But you're right, the SalesForce/Backpage stuff looks bad. I'm glad they're being sued over it. I also suspect that if Sarah were objecting to SalesForce we wouldn't hear about it unless/until the inside version were clearly not working.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Though I can't say much here. I've long been in favour of open-source over FSF-style free licenses. While I appreciate some of Stallman's work and a lot of the FSF's, I *do* think the GPL trips over its own feet in a practical sense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.