On circumcision, 'intactivists' are just wrong - latimes http://www.latimes.com/la-oe-allen-anti-circumcision-activists-20120812,0,2269752.story … The notion that circumcision reduces a man's sexual sensitivity has little basis in fact. Obsession with penis is the issue of the men in movement & their sex life.
-
-
On circumcision, 'intactivists' are just wrong - latimes http://latimes.com/la-oe-allen-an … The notion that circumcision reduces a man's sexual sensitivity has little basis in fact. Obsession with penis is the issue of the men in movement & their sex life.
-
https://circumcisionmovie.com does an excellent job pointing flaws in medical studies w respect to sensitivity, and it’s not wrong to see this as a human rights issue
-
propaganda piece with no actual science. See slate article I posted.
-
Little basis in fact? I was circumcised at 13 years old and the level of sensation was decreased in a dramatic and irreparable way from before being circumcised. At least I had the ability to consent to the the medically necessary procedure (in my case), unlike infants.
-
that flies in the face of several studies that were done comparing circumcised and uncircumcised men that found no differences in sensation
-
Are you stating that my experience is falsified in some way?
-
no just anecdotal.
-
True, however there is room for error in any procedure, why open oneself up to error when something isnt a necessity. That is my point. Sure circumcision has no negative consequences for many people, but for many there are consequences, both severe and minor.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
sorry now that I am researching after the attack I am totally against this anti-semitic movement. You have absolutely lost me forever. NO science, claims refuted, have fun. Get therapy.
-
Sadly, therapy will not bring back what I lost when my foreskin and its dense nerve network was taken from me as an infant.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
don't invite a scientist to a party and then not expect her to do research
-
Yes please. We want everyone to do research. There are several studies that come to different conclusions about the issue. The facts are many men have been physically and psychologically impaired by circumcision. Unfortunately many men aren’t really aware of what they’ve lost.
-
sorry all the research I did does not support your claim. You lost me. It is anti-semitism.
-
So if being against circumcision is anti-Semitic I assume you are pro Female genital mutilation cause by your logic being against it is Islamophobic, so either you are pro FGM or you are a racist bigot
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Dude, I don't care if you have a limp noodle! No woman gives a damn about some psychosexual male dysfunction or dysphoria! Just not on our top 10 list. Our entire world caters to men and a sad handful of individuals are still not able to make a go of it. TFB- sucks to be them
-
My noodle is not limp. Fortunately my issues are not as severe as others. In my case I have noticed a degree of lost sensitivity in my gland I have aged, because it has not been protected by the foreskin which is present on uncircumcised men.
-
research does not support your claim. see the slate article I posted. No difference between circumcised and uncircumcised men
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
this page includes my uncensored thoughts and adult themes.
I just want to leave this right here. This page does a good job of summing of some of the anatomical point intactivists make regarding physical benefits of keeping foreskin: