Megan Higgs

@critical_infer

Statistician, scientist, writer

Bozeman, MT
critical-inference.com
Vrijeme pridruživanja: listopad 2015.
0 fotografija ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @critical_infer

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @critical_infer

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    Kind of funny.

    8 proslijeđenih tweetova 40 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  2. 31. sij

    Appreciate the antilibrary (and maybe the antiresume and antischolar as well).

    Poništi
  3. 27. sij

    I was also one who made a conscious decision not to respond to the survey.

    ‘Appalling science’ and dichotomania: my response to Hardwicke and Ioannidis
    2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  4. 19. sij

    My favorite app about/for meditation, mindfulness, etc. I particularly love the lessons and conversations. [You have been invited to experience the Waking Up app for free. The app is unlocked for one month. Enjoy.]

    Poništi
  5. 14. sij

    We need more ignorance, or at least awareness of it.

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. sij

    No, I don’t think that this study offers good evidence that installing air filters in classrooms has surprisingly large educational benefits.

    1 reply 56 proslijeđenih tweetova 136 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. pro 2019.

    A year-close thought on "confidence," "significance" etc., paraphrasing Korzybski, Science and Sanity (1958): "We do not realize the tremendous power the structure of habitual language has and impresses upon us unconsciously, automatically projected upon the world around us."

    Decision letter for 2019: "ultimately, your year lacked novelty. I share this concern and thus have decided to decline 2019 for publication."
    15 proslijeđenih tweetova 33 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  8. 2. sij

    Statistical inference. Fact detector? It is not.

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. pro 2019.

    This might be my favorite sentence, talking about the open access publishing model: "This would effectively nationalize the valuable American intellectual property that we produce and force us to give it away to the rest of the world for free."

    8 replies 3 proslijeđena tweeta 28 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 20. pro 2019.

    Defining replication. Time to revisit a fundamental statistical concept relative to how the word is often used today.

    1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. pro 2019.

    Attempts at providing helpful explanations of statistics must avoid instilling misleading or harmful notions: ‘Statistical significance just tells us whether or not something definitely does or definitely doesn’t cause cancer’

    15 proslijeđenih tweetova 31 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  12. 17. pro 2019.

    Trust is complicated.

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. pro 2019.

    Response to criticisms of Bayesian statistics

    16 proslijeđenih tweetova 53 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. 16. pro 2019.

    Valuable description of a valuable perspective -- the world needs more reminders to think deeply about what one might really be estimating (or trying to estimate) and all the assumptions woven in and around it.

    Causal inference and within/between person comparisons
    1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. pro 2019.

    What does it mean when they say there’s a 30% chance of rain?

    25 proslijeđenih tweetova 62 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    11. pro 2019.

    “Inferential statistics as descriptive statistics”

    11 proslijeđenih tweetova 30 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  17. 10. pro 2019.

    Revisiting a year later - Parachutes don't work any better than a backpack. And, "Scientists often read just the conclusion of a study and then draw their own conclusions that are far more sweeping than are justified by the actual findings."

    1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  18. 4. pro 2019.

    "It can be hard for people to shake off this habit. But, remember: type 1 and type 2 errors are theoretical constructs based on false models. Keep your eye on the ball and remember your larger goals. When it comes to statistical methods,the house is stronger than the foundations"

    What’s wrong with null hypothesis significance testing
    Poništi
  19. 4. pro 2019.

    "Bayesian inference is a tool. It solves some problems but not all, and I’m exhausted by the ideology of the Bayes-evangelists."

    What’s wrong with Bayes
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. stu 2019.

    Thou shalt not send out questionnaires without piloting them first, nor without a precise plan for how you will analyze the data, with a clear understanding of how these analyses will support your objectives. You are just wasting people's time otherwise.

    11 replies 42 proslijeđena tweeta 200 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

@critical_infer još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·