What a joy to read thoughts on this issue by someone who *really* knows the science and the details:https://twitter.com/kph3k/status/872503350172028932 …
With respect, that was not a very strong argument. It did not address the low probability of discovering such a strong correlation by chance
-
-
Risch, while trying to debunk him, mentioned that he had used Piffer's approach and replicated the results. So the guy is not a total fraud.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.