I've speculated before that Polynesians, Icelanders, and perhaps Serbo-Croatians all evolved great size, muscular bulk, and short limbs as an adaptation to wet cold. I know that one of the most distinctive Polynesian physical traits, thick thighs, are also seen in Scandinavians.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @crimkadid
I advise you to read Phillip Houghton’s theories on the evolution of Polynesian morphology. It’s an incredible story of how cold-nights on the water required thickness around the bone, but hot equatorial days selected against fat, due to fat having insultative properties.
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @Hatcheshatchis1
Uriah Retweeted Uriah
Uriah added,
Uriah @crimkadidGoing to come out of eight years of Twitter lurking to try and answer some basic problems of human variation, first one being: "why are Polynesians so big and strong?", with implications for some Europeans too.@Steve_Sailer ,@gcochran99,@espressosoldo ,@bronzeagemantisShow this thread1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @crimkadid
Awesome stuff. Would you agree that Polynesian size - although catalysed by “wet-cold” - was much more of a unique process than Northern Hemisphere adaptations? Those aforementioned groups are notorious for having a high % of Type I fibers
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't know about anything about Icelandic muscle fibers; the root cause of the selection is identical and the different similar physical manifestations so similar that I doubt there is anything unique about what happened to Polynesians.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.