You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Here, non-Slavic Lithuanians serve as a better representation of Proto-Slavs than say, Poles because of their greater isolation (Balts are the most European Europeans) These numbers explain a bit: for example, why Greeks are less Middle Eastern than South Italians.
The Slavic migration to Greece is well known, but very little talked about. I read Norwich's great little history of Byzantium and I don't think they got one full page of attention, despite contributing a huge chunk of the ancestry of today's Greeks. People don't care about Slavs
To put this in perspective, David at Eurogenes modeled Mycenenan Greeks as being as about 20% steppe herder and 80% Minoan. If these numbers are right, that would mean that Slavs had a greater genetic impact on today's Greeks than the actual Greeks themselves did.
The principal source of ancestry belongs to the mysterious Pre-Greek population which donated the consonant clusters -nth and -ss as in Corinth or Thalassa and which may have been Pelasgian (who may themselves have been Lemnians).
Is there any reason to think the admixture had to be a single folk-migration? Persistent importation of slaves over many centuries culminating in a small migration would fit the historical record perfectly (& the etymology)
The Slavs in Greece arrived as raiders and conquerors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sclaveni Genuinely Slavic Bulgarians are clearly the result of a migration and not slavery and are not so far apart genetically from Greeks.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
