Uriah

In other words, it is very difficult for a typical European to match Japanese omega-3 levels, even when eating an ungodly amount of fish.

There’s likely a feedback loop here: populations that eat more fish evolve with time to better process EPA+DHA and this makes the beneficial physical and mental effects of stuff much more salient for them.

Someone would need to demonstrate this, but I think I’ve noticed a tendency for the Japanese to remain relatively immune to diminishing marginal returns here: every extra fish eaten does less and less for an Englishman, but there’s no end to what the Japanese can metabolize.

Population geneticists have detected recent strong natural selection acting on carbohydrate metabolism in Europeans and genes which facilitate ketogenesis in the meat eating peoples of the Arctic. I think it’s unlikely that something similar has not gone on in the Japanese.

There has a lot of recent research on the cognitive effects ofomega-3 and the most rock solid findings are that they dramatically aggression and the risk of developing schizophrenia. There’s a national correlation -0.63 (strong) between seafood consumption and homicide rate.

The Japanese are impossibly peaceful people. The country with +1 million people in Europe with the lowest homicide rate is Norway with 0.47 deaths per 100,000 people and Japan is down to just 0.26.

Why the difference in ethnocentrism between both?