The stereotype we associate with Scandinavians is blondness; this is rooted in truth but goes a bit too far. Norwegians and Danes are blonder than say, Germans, but much less than Finns and Latvians. So now the obvious Jerry Seinfeld question: “What’s the deal with blond hair!?
-
Show this thread
-
Blond girls are purty, they’re so purty that people should wonder why all North Europeans (South Euros have to worry about the sun damaging light skin) don’t have Targaryen hair: shouldn’t through sexual selection they decimate the competition?
2 replies 1 retweet 32 likesShow this thread -
The major clue here is provided by the Irish, who are just as white as Scandinavians and yet dramatically less blond.pic.twitter.com/esUzZIKDAA
1 reply 1 retweet 29 likesShow this thread -
L-DOPA stimulates ACTH, which darkens hair and dopamine helps to account for both Irish wildnesss and the “Black Irish” lookhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOaAngNB1u0&t=1m0s …
2 replies 1 retweet 26 likesShow this thread -
I’ve argued before that because of higher Vitamin D stores the Irish have a greater inborn resistance to schizophrenia. When schiz is less of a problem, the result is that interesting, psychotic dark haired men sexually outcompete blond dullards.pic.twitter.com/OrHRzsH5MD
6 replies 5 retweets 55 likesShow this thread -
What I’m contending here is that if Schizophrenia didn’t exist, then the result would be that North Europeans would evolved to have white skin and raven dark hair of the king seen in ultra-charismatic Lotharios like Elvis (who was about half Scottish himself.)
2 replies 2 retweets 42 likesShow this thread -
I should mention for a second that the Irish also drift in an African direction in the great thickness of their skin.pic.twitter.com/sDwybO9RAz
4 replies 1 retweet 32 likesShow this thread -
I think a lot about how popular idioms about the body and personality might be reflecting something real ("thin skinned"), that part of the psychological toughness of the Blacks/Irish might be apparent in their skin.
3 replies 4 retweets 46 likesShow this thread -
Norwegians are dullards by any reasonable standard, but for their small population they’ve produced more recognizable creatives than the more numerous Swedes: Grieg, Munch (seen here), Knausgaard. Blonds are dull.pic.twitter.com/SfqhKCVOvj
2 replies 3 retweets 40 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Nathaniel Weyl noticed that in the United States Norwegians produce fewer great men than Danes and Swedes. I think their high consumption of fish has partly redirected selection toward omega-3 metabolism as opposed to schiz per se. In other words, I think they're kind of dumb.
-
-
Replying to @crimkadid
Although fish eating Icelanders are probably dumber judging by their anomalously low PISA scores. To be extraordinarily accomplished in the arts you need both IQ and mild psychotism. Norwegians are sort of crazy and the great people they produce are...memorable.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.