I wrote a papr ( with Paul Ewald) " infectious causation of disease: an evolutionary perspective". Hamilton reviewed it.
-
-
Replying to @gcochran99 @acid_tv and
i really don't care what hamilton said, but you're misrepresenting things. this paper is related to a different one of your fringe beliefs (homosexuality as infectious disease), not to the race/iq stuff you're talking about here
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @dbweissman @gcochran99 and
if anything, you're arguing against your race/iq position. you say that big MZ-DZ gaps don't show that we should regard a trait as "genetic", & that instead the real question is the effect of potential interventions. a nice example, actuallypic.twitter.com/kUw3u2N0qa
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @joftius @dbweissman and
Why would novelty preclude something from being heritable? If people differ in their responses to novel stimuli, and those differences are partly due to genes, then preferences will be somewhat heritable.
2 replies 0 retweets 42 likes -
Replying to @andmisterbill @joftius and
It just shows how nonsensical heritability and claims surrounding it are. Hip-hop preferences are very clearly not genetic
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @thebirdmaniac @joftius and
Idk how you could be so confident about that.
1 reply 0 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @andmisterbill @joftius and
Because hip-hop has only existed for like 40 years. Genotypes didn't rapidly change in the 80s
8 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
Naismith invented basketball in 1891, but who doubts that basketball ability is a strongly genetic trait?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.