Christian PiccioliniVerified account

Can you address his explanation, namely that you attributed specific positions to those two people which they do not actually hold?

I posted a long thread with links to the facts.

You can't slander people on a podcast with no actual proof and expect not to have it edited out. You provided no proof and this makes u look petty. I would be more careful with ur accusations. I enjoy your message but attacking those people is unwise.

Attacking Molyneaux and Peterson is fine. It's levelling false allegations against them which is bad. Both are scumbags and there's more than enough true things to criticise them for, why double down on a false allegation???

It's really upsetting because his message is good and needs to be heard but this kind of clouds the message in my opinion. I feel bad he's gone that low. Stefan sucks and shouldn't be highlighted, but guarantee he made fans with those comments. JP isn't even a right winger.

I agree with you on Molyneaux, JBP not so much. Peterson played footsie with the AltRight for ages until it became inconvenient. And Peterson is an anti-Enlightenment mystical Jungian with an dangerously post-truth epistemology that looks way too much like AltRight/Russian stuff.

If you're engaging with ideas you're not alt right, I'm sorry but he never has played footsie with the alt right, I don't even care about JP but it's just kind of wrong to say that. Been shapiro is not alt right, and other conservatives are not alt right. Alt right = ethnic state

Again, Peterson was appearing in photos with Kekistsn flags, wearing pepé badges, etc. That's playing footsie with the alt right. I never said Shapiro was alt right - Shapiro is a hack, bit he's not alt right.

Kekistan and Pepe are trolling props directed towards SJWs and the alt-left. Peterson clearly does not take them seriously.

Yes, Kek does not equal Nazi. The people who think that are as dangerous as Nazis.

I’m a big fan of yours Christian, and agree Molyneux appeals to racists, but I don’t think this tweet is constructive. It’s fair for Sam to be concerned about libel. Instead of attacking him after he gives you a forum, why not take this opportunity to share your evidence again?

I did. I posted a whole 13 part thread with links. Also, it's only libel or slander if it's not true.

And many believe that it's not...

What "many believe" is irrelevant to the FACTS, is it not??

Let me rephrase that. Many have looked at the facts, noticed that they speak against Christian's statements, and conclude that Christian was speaking out of his ass.

Better, but it sounds to me like u r saying ppl have different opinions on the subject. So y not let Christian's stand as his own? I don't think anyone listening to the podcast would concluded these were Sam's opinions. He's doing the same censoring he accuses the left of doing.

It’s Sam’s platform and his podcast. He has the right to edit out info he deems inaccurate. Even if it’s obvious that Sam is not the one espousing the ideas. If the info was indeed correct there are better ways of providing that evidence than saying Sam is covering for racists

Completely agree re: it being Sam's party and he can cry if he wants to. But in fairness Christian only accused him of that because Sam was so quick to throw him under the bus when challenged by the very ppl Christian has spent his career confronting.