Cary Gross

@cpgYALE

Primary care doc, outcomes (COPPER) Center; Director, National Clinician Scholars Program . Advocate for access to healthcare and scientific data.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: lipanj 2012.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @cpgYALE

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @cpgYALE

  1. prije 2 minute

    ...when authors met criteria for the initially submitted manuscript, the team shouldn't be forced to drop them for a resubmitted version. They either meet ICMJE criteria or not.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. prije 5 minuta

    Why do medical journals suggest cutting authors when they ask for a full-length manuscript to be resubmitted as a research letter? Makes no sense, forcing people off the authorship team... 1/2

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. 30. sij

    Helpful step in the right direction: Journals to allow centralized repository of self-reported financial conflict info, to automatically populate disclosures. Would be better yet if tied to data too!

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    Can’t believe I won my first Hackathon with such dynamic teammates!!!! The Yale Healthcare Hackathon was an amazing opportunity to pitch a way to promote healthcare workforce diversity and learn innovative strategies to improve !

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 26. sij

    Fantastic & team taking home top honors in the hackathon. Can't wait to see prototype!

    Poništi
  6. 24. sij

    Looking for a resource for teaching/learning Telephone Medicine? I'm admittedly biased, but this is a helpful, practical guide written for physicians; I'm sure there are tons more recent, comprehensive sources in nursing literature:

    Poništi
  7. 24. sij

    What a treat to begin Paris trip meeting at the 1300+ year old Hôtel-Dieu, and discussing how to measure & reduce treatment burden. Inspiring locale & ideas! Thx for connecting us, . Vive la (patient) revolution!

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij

    This is making the rounds today I redacted it. Don't google. I want to explain why these sorts of lists are deeply unhealthy; Same goes for the most cited researchers, IF, altmetric. empty brass rings We'd be better off if twitter did not even display follower count [thread]

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 18. sij

    This makes no sense. uniforms need to either actually go for camouflage (black with tiny galaxies and comets) or better yet just go for all in on look

    Poništi
  10. 15. sij

    What a panel: Scholar past and present on the big screen, conveying a richness of experience that traditional print media cannot.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. sij

    Nice to see this well-researched review get so much attention - important to note that half the key premise - "weaker evidence" - derives from the great work done by posted on

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    13. sij

    So ACT UP wasn’t just about the fiery protests. We made change happen because we learned the science, the statistics, the policies and could offer critiques that advanced patients’ interests and the need for access and answers. 1/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. sij

    A new study . led by . shows breast density notification laws are not helping some women understand the implications of breast density or their increased risk of .

    Poništi
  14. 6. sij

    So glad that your mother didn't forego her treatment. We've found that patients who choose ONLY alternative therapy (in leiu of) conventional treatment for curable cancers have a higher risk of death

    Poništi
  15. 6. sij

    Glass half-full? I actually don't find it reassuring that 1/3 of new drugs approved via accelerated pathway had a serious safety signal within two years. Many of these were approved on surrogate outcomes, and post-marketing studies far from optimal.

    Poništi
  16. 6. sij

    Wonderful piece addressing "diagnostic cascade". Docs frequently fail to consider downstream consequences of excessive testing. We are "..just one more test"-ing our patients into worse physical and financial health.

    Poništi
  17. 5. sij

    Why are some provider groups able/willing to provide equitable care? We need to figure this out – what are best practices to ensure in at the provider level. Seems like a good resolution for 2020.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 5. sij

    We found that magnitude of the income-related disparity varied dramatically across physician teams. Some groups provide highly equitable care (low and high SES equally likely to get Bx). Others, not so much.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 5. sij

    Could health equity vary across care teams? Led by , we explored disparities in needle biopsy use: did the magnitude of economic disparity vary across physician teams?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 5. sij

    We were curious about physician teams We know that docs who care for patients within teams (“patient-sharing networks”) tend to practice in a similar manner (i.e. shared practice style/resources). 4/7

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·