my intuition is yes. imagine school subjects like "biology/computer science", exploring what innovations they have spurred in each other, as well as what sense we can find in reality with their coupling
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
-
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
interdisciplinarity is self-evident? or its teaching? just so i understand what you're saying
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
Interdisciplinarity lacks formal learning structure, I don't think we can teach it. I think it's more something the student learns than is taught like an amalgamation of interests. Btw it's nice to see you pop in here every now and then Em.
-
i think the lack of formal learning structure is exactly why it should be introduced. but perhaps 'facilitated exploration' is a better term than 'teaching'. And thanks Terrance, I've been in a weird intellectual bubble for a while. Couldn't find any words.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
most curiosities are interlinked; following them eventually lead to interdisciplinary fields it’s not an explicit process though i stumbles into cognitive science by way of philosophy then neuroscience and then psychology similarly with cybernetics
-
i agree, a kind of 'anti-discipline' regard comes naturally with authentic curiosity. but i also have an inkling that curiosity can be nurtured. how did i come to have it? by nature or nurture? the answer is both and
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I think interdisciplinarity just means that your research program spans multiple academic departments Is there a skill to teach?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
If we can teach someone how to construct great metaphors, yes.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.