Am I the only one that finds this conversation fundamentally disturbinghttps://twitter.com/AgnesCallard/status/1164957248218701825 …
-
im trying to put it into words. essentially, i think that this could be effective, though i feel an aversion to the fact that this kind of thing needs to be done at all in order to delay or discourage environmental degradation. it's obviously idealistic, but i can't help but...
wonder why we cannot have an economic system that encourages preservation without that being a burden. tragedy of the commons situations such as this aren't naturally accounted for under our current economic paradigm. i think paying ppl is a bandaid fix and ignores the real prob
-
-
also, paying them not to develop it means that brazil etc. have a fundamental ownership over it. i also dislike this, as its flourishing is necessary to everyone's survival. basically in this model someone has to pick up the tab, but nobody wants to put their hands up
-
(despite that being in everyones best interests overall. its not in their best interests short-term/economically. which is a massive failure in the system)
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.