Jordan Hall and Daniel Schmachtenberger suggest we hone our perception, sensemaking and choice-making abilities to increase sovereignty. Choice-making includes action but I'm wondering if "doing" needs to be separated as its own category?
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Totally. They're all nested/intertwined and reliant on each other. But do we need to separate the output part as its own category to focus more attention on the doing?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @rhyscass
Like
@cosimia_@antonjw and you've mentioned, the actual delivery part can be hard, especially in these times of existential risk. Like, what should I actually do that would be good for me, my family & Gaia? (without negative externalities/long-term effects, pays bills etc)1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Hmmmm interesting. Maybe a better emphasis on theorising, planning, and understanding as compared to experimenting (happens in reality) using such frameworks.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
I get the feel, especially listening to the emerge podcast, of like "okay but now what do I DO". And I think Daniel often tries to ask that as well, with varying degrees of success xD a problem I see in this community is a preoccupation with abstract ideals
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä
Though I also see a lot of action happening, as a direct result of all the theory stuff. But our communication about such experiments, their progress, and how people can help/what resources are needed, could be improved Otherwise the urge to help w/o direction can overwhelm
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.