if its true that humans generally dont know whats best for us, - democracy aint great - free markets aint g authoritarian structures like govs are meant to act as some generally accurate and unbiased influencer for our mistakes, but so long as theyre human theyre the same as us
-
Show this thread
-
if you put experts in positions of power for their relative field, and allow them to account for the mistakes most ppl make in their judgement of 'good-for-us', this probably makes that problem better but power corrupts & ppl are reactionary when people counter their wants
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
again, if claim 1 is true, and total freedom of choice is not the best way of organising ourselves, value-driven technological assistants will probably help. theyre accurate to the values, and cant be corrupted by power or swated by emotions
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
also, they're a lot less palatable. gentle nudges & influences by tech make it seem like our decisions are our own, because its not another person telling us what to do. its simply a different presentation of info to nudge us in certain directions. and it can be personalised
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
yes im thinking theoretically favorably about a dictatorial AI what r u up to
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @cosimia_
AI is good for science and engineering, but not good for moral leadership.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I have hopes bill One daypic.twitter.com/4SIfLJOSqz
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
