Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
if its true that humans generally dont know whats best for us, - democracy aint great - free markets aint g authoritarian structures like govs are meant to act as some generally accurate and unbiased influencer for our mistakes, but so long as theyre human theyre the same as us
if you put experts in positions of power for their relative field, and allow them to account for the mistakes most ppl make in their judgement of 'good-for-us', this probably makes that problem better but power corrupts & ppl are reactionary when people counter their wants
again, if claim 1 is true, and total freedom of choice is not the best way of organising ourselves, value-driven technological assistants will probably help. theyre accurate to the values, and cant be corrupted by power or swated by emotions
also, they're a lot less palatable. gentle nudges & influences by tech make it seem like our decisions are our own, because its not another person telling us what to do. its simply a different presentation of info to nudge us in certain directions. and it can be personalised
yes im thinking theoretically favorably about a dictatorial AI what r u up to
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
