people must (and want to) consume in order to do so, people must also produce. people dont always want to produce the same things they consume some people have a greater ability (and/or willingness) to produce things than others
Näytä tämä ketju
-
we currently value things by supply (how much of a thing there is) and demand (how much people want the thing) i wonder if theres some other way of evaluating ventures and things that are produced (and therefore consumed)
Näytä tämä ketju
id personally like it to include these dimensions - novelty (is it new - does it provide some new functionality / perspective) - sustainability (circular economy, will it last, is it an investment in the future) - agreeableness (do people like it)
-
-
agreeableness is probably closest to demand novelty is probably good bc creating new things are probably good sustainability may not be in high demand, but is necessary id like to think how/where/at what level this could be accounted for
Näytä tämä ketju -
maybe its just huge ass subsidies maybe its greater transparency or consumer awareness idk maybe demand just isnt all that great given we dont really know whats best for us + life
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
well im thinking not. bc if demand prioritised sustainability & novelty, for example, to the degree it should, we shouldnt have probs with unsustainability. and awesome artists should be able to earn enough to live. i think. also demand is easily influenced
- Näytä vastaukset
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.