i guess ideology might be necessary in order to justify the structure of a society. but the problematic thing is ideologies justify themselves with a false assertion of truth, which makes it difficult to be challenged
-
-
Näytä tämä ketjuKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
What makes something ideology?
-
One stab: it's when you _need_ it to be true. It's when, if it weren't true, things would not _be okay_.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Okay, just looked it up. Beliefs held for reasons that aren't purely epistemic. I think this means that our desires have seeped into our models of reality. That is, that way that we believe the world should be has seeped into the way we believe it is.
-
good way of putting it. i can say, for example, democracy is good. good according to what? maybe good according to freedom. well, is freedom good? if we assume yes, thats an ideological assumption. we cannot prove it. though maybe we can do so pragmatically.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
What matters is how ideas are treated. Can they be changed and criticized and disagreed with - or not?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
had to read 5 times before i understood but now im enlightened is this non-violent communication
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
I don’t see why not both. We have to start somewhere, but there’s no limit to how wrong we can be, so we want our best ideas for the moment to be replaced by better ones eventually. 1/2
-
If we fool ourselves that our ideologies are final, they’re typically used either to reject facts that don’t fit the worldview (religion) or to tweak all facts into fitting the worldview (psychoanalysis). 2/2
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.