How can we evenly distribute the future such that we can maximise the number of people who have the time, resources, and education to create a moral and exciting world?
-
semantics bro. i've got to use we, as it concerns us as an entire species. and I dont think it does demand a top-down solution. maybe that's our first thought because it's all we're used to. hence why I posed the question to spark alternative modes of thinking
also i'd say 'create' and 'allow' seem pretty authoritarian at first glance as well :P
-
-
When freedom becomes enslavement & rejection of authority identical to authoritarianism we’ve entered a realm linguistic relativism. I don’t buy it. An ancient idea - repeatedly refuted in practise - is ‘even distribution’ is for the good. Few ever embrace a new idea: it’s evil.
-
There’s lots of “at first glance” virtues that turn out to be real liabilities & causes of both local & global suffering on analysis: altruism, compromise, equality of outcome... Many have religious antecedents so are deeply embedded in culture as memes. False ideas nonetheless.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.