How can we evenly distribute the future such that we can maximise the number of people who have the time, resources, and education to create a moral and exciting world?
semantics bro. i've got to use we, as it concerns us as an entire species. and I dont think it does demand a top-down solution. maybe that's our first thought because it's all we're used to. hence why I posed the question to spark alternative modes of thinking
-
-
also i'd say 'create' and 'allow' seem pretty authoritarian at first glance as well :P
-
When freedom becomes enslavement & rejection of authority identical to authoritarianism we’ve entered a realm linguistic relativism. I don’t buy it. An ancient idea - repeatedly refuted in practise - is ‘even distribution’ is for the good. Few ever embrace a new idea: it’s evil.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
