Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
y'all know any of those people that > are smart enough to not be super ideological & spread falsehoods, but as a result > are unable to agree with anything anyone says or have opinions on issues because 'well, things are complicated' (they're terrible for discussions)
yes, nuance is a important. but science is still a thing. people can still make factual statements. some opinions CAN be worse than others, once contextualised. and, surprise, being neutral/centrist on every issue without thought is still ideology my friend
(shh no im subtweeting my housemate dont tell him)
Well, I mean, it's a complicated issue...
Yes, no one is (at least I am not) saying otherwise, but still, there are MANY topics that cannot be regarded in black and white, many subjects that have to be regarded under a more thorough light.
Otherwise, we could end engaging in the same kind of blind rationality that we seek to oppose
Neutral is the only god I know
everything balances eventually and paradoxes are universal
There's emotional level of thinking, where passionate opinions appear, and there is objective thinking where reality is a complex fluid dynamic chaos. And it's really challenging for us to be on one level while someone else is on another level. And then there is depression...
It's easy to confuse existential nihilism for "objectivity", because the outcome of being dispassionate looks the same.
Holding onto neutral blameless existence is a good way to become a tool of abusers
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
