but alas, the biggest players have the most data, money, & training time. google is simply the best. do we go for efficiency at the expense of security?
-
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
also side lol if someone asked me what the internet was i legit couldnt answer them
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I would love to see what happens honestly
-
i reckon id cry
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
How do those (tremendously valuable and effective) forms of human cooperation risk the loss of core infrastructure? And they’re risky compared to what?
-
risky in the case of war or some weird authoritarian law being introduced most-probably. and the risk is precisely because its so valuable and effective.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
No chaos, at least not that much. There are already small decentralized groups would step up and provide these services instead, there is youtube (peertube), google(searx), twitter (Mastodon), facebook (diaspora) and other things that us geeks are running already.
-
https://disroot.org/en https://framasoft.org/en/ Are two of those organizations, there are a couple more out there.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
People would develop a better language/protocol for sharing and networking computers. It would be the beginning of a more evolved internet. But it would take years before anyone knew about it. It took a quarter century (and the web) before the internet became a household name.
-
I guess internet 2.0 might be quicker to catch on, seeing as everyone already has some experience with the old one (and will be actively looking for an alternative)
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.