It's actually the first example he cites in the article.
-
-
-
Ha gottem
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Naah this is too extreme and is deeply flawed by refusing to have a "history". Bad norms don't came w o a reason. This mean in many other contexts a bad norms is a good one. P. Dilemma must be studied in evolutionary stages like Axelrod did. On the long time, it can selfregulate.
-
It's not even about the shock example that's bad because it's unrealistic, the unrealistic part people expectating to be mass murdered by the right of other people to murder the deviants. A setup like that would only end spreading deviancy autodestructing the norm.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.