Can vary quite a lot but generally answered by how quickly you can identify the right data to use for training and then if you can get enough of it (seen this take weeks, also seen it take 6 months)
-
-
-
Mm I thought that it would've been very data centric In that case, it could be that better/more prolific data capture would be better for advancing AI than AI research itself :p
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It would take minimum 4 months of coding that particular language every day to get to a point like that. But it wouldn't be particularly difficult.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A lot of it depends on the training data. The actual code can be very short (but complex). Training time varies a lot too. SVMs are pretty quick to train. Big neural nets take a long time to train. But there are services online that let you upload CSVs and auto-train like bigML
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
NLP takes a bit for some people to wrap their head around. Image based stuff is a lot more intuitive because you can visualize the learned features. There's challenge is knowing how to encode your data well, and get good training data that represents the task at hand.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
