Have you looked into Andrew Yang's idea of Human Centered Capitalism? Sounds great in theory.. but I'm curious to see how it would look when implemented. https://www.yang2020.com/policies/human-capitalism/ …
Capitalism is generative towards capital (2nd order: consumption, production) Ensuring that optimisation isn't harmful is largely up to legal interventions which reduce efficiency Could our economy be generative towards people and nature instead? What would that look like?pic.twitter.com/l6Pc2vP7MY
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
It's all got to be consensual/voluntary. The way we organize ourselves is essentially a game, which is great as long as individuals get to choose which game/s to play, and what kind of player/character to be in the games they join in on.
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
Capitalism isn’t really about capital. The word ‘capitalism’ seems to misguide its critics. It’s about goods and services. That’s why I tend to think in terms of free markets, which makes that more obvious.
-
I think the most common meaning of capitalism is a competitive game, rather than a collaborative one. But, yes, there is also the more of fashioned difference between a totalitarian economy and democratic one.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
You mean an anti-rivalrous economy?
-
Ooh that is a good and nice word. Though I guess it's not possible considering we have finite resources. There's always going to be some form of competition & need to allocate, just depends on what allocation is sustainable
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.