You mean an anti-rivalrous economy?
-
-
-
Ooh that is a good and nice word. Though I guess it's not possible considering we have finite resources. There's always going to be some form of competition & need to allocate, just depends on what allocation is sustainable
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Capitalism isn’t really about capital. The word ‘capitalism’ seems to misguide its critics. It’s about goods and services. That’s why I tend to think in terms of free markets, which makes that more obvious.
-
I think the most common meaning of capitalism is a competitive game, rather than a collaborative one. But, yes, there is also the more of fashioned difference between a totalitarian economy and democratic one.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think a different economy could. But I'm very skeptical as to whether this one can. My line of thought: it needs an opposing nature-based economic growth system pitted against it; together achieving equilibrium Our economic is entirely human-centric.
-
It's all got to be consensual/voluntary. The way we organize ourselves is essentially a game, which is great as long as individuals get to choose which game/s to play, and what kind of player/character to be in the games they join in on.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Have you looked into Andrew Yang's idea of Human Centered Capitalism? Sounds great in theory.. but I'm curious to see how it would look when implemented.https://www.yang2020.com/policies/human-capitalism/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
