Rights need to be protectable with enforceable laws. Reasons need to be sound, valid, and relevant. Replace "right" with "power." Replace "reasoning" with "relevant facts."
Weird, but what would things look like if it was a human right to understand an argument? Like, in an effort to reduce group think & misinformation, you had to justify your assertions with reasoning. It would at least be nice in the realm of politics :')
-
-
-
The laws of physics are really the only laws that give rights. We either feel like we understand someone else's perspective or we don't, based on physics. And our feeling of understanding is somewhat unrelated to whether or not we really can see things from their perspective.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
The obligation to explain or give reasons for an opinion doesn't follow from the "right to understand an argument".
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.