Further: how many of our problems are a problem of technology, and how many are a problem of distribution? How do we better distribution? And who decides what that looks like? I have so many qns
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The problem is we do not value time, nor do we acknowledge dissonances. Put together we are paranoid and panicked.
-
aint that the truth
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Interested to know what you mean by 'emergence' here
-
k so from my (limited) understanding, emergence is basically the phenomenon of a whole being greater than the sum of its parts, and it arises out of a whole bunch of random things colliding in such a way that it creates a complex pattern. think birds flying in patterns & ants
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
With the right knowledge we can do what we want. If we don’t know, it doesn’t mean we can’t know. But that we can know doesn’t mean we will know.
-
Add on: with the right knowledge and order, we can do what we want
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Humans have rarely been lucky: nature has nearly always conspired against us. We had to create our own luck, which is why we are still here. People control the future: if we want to, we can be the beginning of infinity.
-
my whole existence relies on this being the case :P
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Anthropic principle: we observe things, more of us are there to observe things when we do well, therefore we should expect to see things going well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
