Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
(preface, I'm not an economist) The problem I see with accounting for externalities using taxes and subsidies that they basically tech you in econ 101 that those things are bad. They moosh the economy around in places it doesn't want to be & result in a misallocation of...
Resources away from the natural equilibrium. But - couldn't we say that the natural equilibrium is actually wrong? It assumes it accounts for the total cost of the good & assumes perfect information between consumers & corps. This aint the case
Finally: how does one put a price on the destruction of the environment? Who gets to say how valuable a prefer of fertile land is?
Valuation of land is contextual and predictive. What does the surrounding society need, what can that land provide, what do you plan to do with it? Environmental destruction is a cost almost exclusively borne by others/future people. It is not factored into the market now.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
