there's a difference between being critical of your information sources and dismissing strong, evidence-based scientific consensus (the closest to truth we're ever going to get) there is a trend of people jumping to extremes. a few science papers were disproven, so all... https://twitter.com/M1ichaelW/status/1090206679160012800 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
science is a sham. one radical person says something baseless, so all people resembling them in their other opinions are similarly stupid. this is very obviously incorrect logic. cherry picking outliers and using one person's character to judge all others is silly.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
be critical, be curious, and be aware of the influences of peoples and corporation's agendas. but don't fall into the trap of becoming so cynical you reject all knowledge and truth. thats a scary and dangerous place to be. basically, recognise reactionaries. thats ideology.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread
agree that theres a lot we dont know. and that there's things we know now that will be proven wrong in the future. still - these things have been proven wrong. with better technology we know know the earth is round, not flat. tech improves & so does the probability we are right
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
