fundamentally, we are conscious observers of the universe. I like to perceive our relation as symbiotic - the universe needs us in order for its existence to be acknowledged, and likewise, we need it in order for our existence to be possible this cosmic duality fascinates me.
-
difficult to tell. if this emergence of consciousness was simply a coincidence, then i would say its incompatible because nothing intervened (core of theism). but if consciousness is something the universe is somehow programmed to achieve, then it would be compatible
either way, i dont think the concept of a 'creator' or 'supreme being' in theism/deism lends itself to this idea. more likely i would lean towards the possibility of emergence as the potential fuel towards the creation of consciousness, if that makes any sense
-
-
But if there's no creator, or higher power of any sort, then all the interactions of chemicals, planets, stars etc. right from the start would be pre- determined by laws and initial conditions. Therefore how could genuine consciousness & free will spontaneously come to be?
-
i have very little clue
what was the state of the universe before the big bang? surely not a whole load of nothing. matter cant be created or destroyed right? who knows. one of life's great mysteries. i for one enjoy that its not so easy to figure out :P - Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Well perhaps quantum physics does infer some randomness, but still
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.