Bayesian rationalists think prediction is what thinking is. Critical rationalists deny many kinds of prediction are even possible, highlighting the growth of knowledge is unpredictable, and that most interesting things rest on this ever-evolving knowledge.https://twitter.com/coponder/status/1239808796647555072 …
I wasn't conjecturing that, and I think you've misunderstood much of what I've said so far. I encourage you to go back and reread looking for a different interpretation.
-
-
I encourage you to explain yourself further instead.
-
If you are interested in untangling this disagreement, send me a DM saying so, and I'll kick it off with some questions so we can start from scratch with an easier medium. (I do think we can learn something from each other.)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.