3/15 #i2 Undeterred by his total blindness to his own #bias & the many serious deficiencies in the 2012 #AAP Circumcision Policy Statement, Dr Freedman (w/2 others) will present this weekend in #sanfrancisco…wait for it…
-
Show this thread
-
4/15
#i2 “Newborn circumcision on the web: An assessment of information quality and bias on the internet and social media.”#i2#AndrewFreedmanBiaspic.twitter.com/x50qbHJw6l1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
5/15
#i2 According to the abstract: “Each source was classified as either medical-based information or opinion/advocacy.” The implication that the 2 are mutually exclusive is false. Were it true, then#AAP#tweetiatricians could not be advocates for their patients.2 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
6/15
#i2 The fact is, the more an objective person reviews the medical facts relating to non therapeutic neonatal#circumcision - w/out#bias - the more that person is appalled by the practice & motivated to end it.1 reply 1 retweet 9 likesShow this thread -
7/15
#i2 Dr Freedman himself struggles w/cognitive dissonance & moral confusion in his own head, boasting to leading intactivist@GeorganneChapin that he’s probably “saved” more children from being circumcised than she has. Now THAT’S advocacy.1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
8/15
#i2 Such “saving” implies Dr Freedman must agree there are, at the very least, valid reasons why a male would NOT want to be circumcised - which in turn necessarily implies that there are valid reasons for a male to resent having a circumcision forced on him.1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
10/15 “OB/GYNs don’t circumcise” (
@markwwilsonmd), “boys aren’t circumcised w/out consent” (@janem1276). And my personal favorite: equating the foreskin w/a skin tag (@Dr_DoNoHarm) (winner of the award for most hypocritical twitter handle)#i21 reply 2 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
11/15
#i2 For all his sneering at “advocacy,” it’s Dr Freedman, not intactivists, who has “scientifically untenable” views & avoids objective discussion of the anatomical facts relating to the foreskin & the (un)ethical nature of its amputation from a healthy child’s body.1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
12/15
#i2 It’s Dr Freedman who’s deathly afraid of having an open, fair & thorough debate of the medical & ethical arguments relating to non therapeutic neonatal circumcision b/c he knows full well it’s a debate he would badly lose.1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread
-
-
14/15
#i2 Can’t wait to see if the presentation (or a video of it) is publicly posted so unbiased physicians & bioethicists can review & comment on it. I know it sounds naive, but my challenge to Dr Freedman is to not just imagine, but actively bring about a day…1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
15/15 When all doctors follow the cardinal principles of medical
#ethics & boys, just like girls, can be welcomed peacefully to a world in which their natural bodies are accorded the respect they deserve.#i2@AmerAcadPeds#tweetiatrician#putkids1st#ACOG2 replies 1 retweet 7 likesShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.