Ice cold. With few exceptions, it's just US doctors who promote circumcision, and their main motivation is the usual one: circumcision is a billion $ industry in the US. Elsewhere, MDs are by varying degrees opposed to it. Danish Medical Ass'n calls it "ethically unacceptable"
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Clearly you understand nothing about libertarianism if you think it is ever appropriate for one person to forcibly amputate another's genitalia w/out compelling medical need.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Never said I'm a libertarian, only that I understand libertarianism, which, again, you clearly don't. Amputating healthy tissue from a child's body is not a decision a parent has legal capacity, let alone responsibility, to make. Can you explain why male genitals are different?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No, libertarianism is about individual freedom. The FIRST plank in the Libertarian Party's 2016 Platform is "1.1 Self-Ownership" and begins w/this sentence: "Individuals own their bodies and have rights over them that other individuals, groups, and governments may not violate."
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Read the first four words (and repeat as needed until you understand them): "Individuals own their bodies." Not "individuals' parents (or doctors, or mohels, etc) own their bodies." Get a clue about the party you say you belong to.
#i20 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
It says nothing about drugs or alcohol. "Individuals own their bodies." To say that has nothing to do with who should get to decide whether to amputate part of an individual's body is probably the most absurdly false statement you've made, & that's really saying something.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.