Ice cold. With few exceptions, it's just US doctors who promote circumcision, and their main motivation is the usual one: circumcision is a billion $ industry in the US. Elsewhere, MDs are by varying degrees opposed to it. Danish Medical Ass'n calls it "ethically unacceptable"
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Clearly you understand nothing about libertarianism if you think it is ever appropriate for one person to forcibly amputate another's genitalia w/out compelling medical need.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Never said I'm a libertarian, only that I understand libertarianism, which, again, you clearly don't. Amputating healthy tissue from a child's body is not a decision a parent has legal capacity, let alone responsibility, to make. Can you explain why male genitals are different?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No, libertarianism is about individual freedom. The FIRST plank in the Libertarian Party's 2016 Platform is "1.1 Self-Ownership" and begins w/this sentence: "Individuals own their bodies and have rights over them that other individuals, groups, and governments may not violate."
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Read the first four words (and repeat as needed until you understand them): "Individuals own their bodies." Not "individuals' parents (or doctors, or mohels, etc) own their bodies." Get a clue about the party you say you belong to.
#i20 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Repeat after me. Read these words and internalize them: permanently impairing a child's bodily function is child abuse. #i2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.