Ice cold. With few exceptions, it's just US doctors who promote circumcision, and their main motivation is the usual one: circumcision is a billion $ industry in the US. Elsewhere, MDs are by varying degrees opposed to it. Danish Medical Ass'n calls it "ethically unacceptable"
2 The AAP & other US doctors are virtually alone among the world's physicians in promoting non therapeutic infant foreskin amputation. Most view it as unhelpful, if not unethical.
-
-
3 A criminal case in MI involves a type of FGM on a girl - a "ritual nick" of her clitoral hood - that is not as invasive or extensive as male circumcision. Do you agree that those who claim this ritual nick is their religious obligation have the right to inflict it on a child?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.