What's speculative is @AmerAcadPeds asserting that the benefits of non therapeutic infant circumcision outweigh the risks, while at the same time admitting “the true incidence of complications after newborn circumcision is unknown." #i2 #tweetiatricians http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2013/03/12/peds.2012-2896 …
So to recap: 1 Nothing is speculative about the way AAP has misled the public about circumcision 2 You simply "don't care" that most doctors disagree that circumcising an infant is helpful or ethical 3 You can't explain why you think MGM but not FGM is ethical...
-
-
...4 Adults, but not infants, can get effective pain management for circ, 5 70%+ of the world's men are intact & share my views, not yours, 6 You never bothered to read the first plank of the party you claim to belong to
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.