-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Circumcision, and anyone who practices it (which includes Christians, Muslims, and Jews), violates human rights. Religion doesn't matter here. Knock it off with the red herring.
2 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Incorrect. No medical organization in the world recommends non therapeutic amputation of an infant's foreskin - a natural, innervated, functional part of the anatomy. And if one ever did, it would not change the fact that it violates all 4 cardinal principles of
#bioethics#i22 replies 3 retweets 6 likes -
Yes, they do, and no, it doesn't.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Let's see if you can produce a statement from the AMA recommending the non therapeutic amputation of an infant's foreskin. In the meantime, have a look at what ethical doctors from the rest of the world have to say on the subject http://www.circumcision.org/position.htm
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
And yes, it does violate all 4 cardinal principles of medical ethics. Proportionality too.https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/medical-ethics/ …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
No one's going to look at your crackpot websites, Bob.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Who's Bob? Reading comprehension is clearly not your strong suit. Still waiting for an AMA statement recommending non therapeutic infant foreskin amputation. Or do you consider them crackpots too?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.